Re: Thank you for your attention and I just want to sniff the mangement and control frames

Joerg Mayer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.ethereal.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 10:08:01PM +0800, ???? wrote:
>        Thank you for your patient guidance.I followed you and
> executed the same command.But it seems there is something  wrong when
> I execute the command
> " iwconfig eth1 channel 1" .

Regarding the results of iwlist, it should be iwconfig eth1 channel 11,
but it doesn't matter, because changing the channel doesn't work.

> <BODY><PRE>[root@MIPV6 ~]# uname -a
> Linux MIPV6 2.6.15 #1 Sat May 20 13:39:07 CST 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
> [root@MIPV6 ~]# lsb_release -a
> LSB Version:    1.3
> Distributor ID: FedoraCore
> Description:    Fedora Core release 4 (Stentz)
> Release:        4
> Codename:       Stentz
> [root@MIPV6 ~]# modinfo ipw2100
> filename:       /lib/modules/2.6.15/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100.ko
> description:    Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 2100 Network Driver
> version:        1.2.0
...
> parm:           mode:network mode (0=BSS,1=IBSS,2=Monitor)
> parm:           channel:channel
...
OK, you are running a fairly current version of the driver and monitor
mode has been compiled in.

> [root@MIPV6 ~]# iwconfig
...
> Warning: Driver for device eth1 has been compiled with version 19
> of Wireless Extension, while this program supports up to version 17.
> Some things may be broken...

I currently have a problem to judge whether this might be the reason for
the problems you are seeing.

> eth1      IEEE 802.11b  ESSID:"netgear2"  Nickname:"ipw2100"
>           Mode:Managed  Frequency:2.462 GHz  Access Point: 00:0F:B5:93:4F:C1
>           Bit Rate=11 Mb/s   Tx-Power:16 dBm
>           Retry min limit:7   RTS thr:off   Fragment thr:off
>           Encryption key:off
>           Power Management:off
>           Link Quality=100/100  Signal level=-56 dBm
>           Rx invalid nwid:0  Rx invalid crypt:0  Rx invalid frag:0
>           Tx excessive retries:0  Invalid misc:101   Missed beacon:0
> 
> [root@MIPV6 ~]# iwlist eth1 scan
> Warning: Driver for device eth1 has been compiled with version 19
> of Wireless Extension, while this program supports up to version 17.
> Some things may be broken...
> 
> eth1      Scan completed :
>           Cell 01 - Address: 00:0F:B5:93:4F:C1
>                     ESSID:"netgear2"
>                     Protocol:IEEE 802.11bg
>                     Mode:Master
>                     Channel:11
There is an AP on channel 11
>                     Encryption key:off
>                     Bit Rate:54 Mb/s
>                     Extra: Rates (Mb/s): 1 2 5.5 6 9 11 12 18 24 36 48 54
>                     Quality:70  Signal level:0  Noise level:0
>                     Extra: Last beacon: 5396ms ago
> 
> [root@MIPV6 ~]# iwconfig eth1 mode monitor

Can you please verify with iwconfig, that eth1 is now in monitor mode?

> [root@MIPV6 ~]# iwconfig eth1 channel 1
> Error for wireless request "Set Frequency" (8B04) :
>     SET failed on device eth1 ; Operation not supported.

Now I'm very confused: This should have "just worked".

> [root@MIPV6 ~]# tethereal -i eth1
> Warning:  Couldn't obtain netmask info (eth1: no IPv4 address assigned).
> Capturing on eth1
>   0.000000 Netgear_93:4f:c1 -&gt; Spanning-tree-(for-bridges)_00 STP Conf. Root = 32768/00:0f:b5:93:4f:c1  Cost = 0  Port = 0x8002
...

And that's how it looks when you only capture ethernet frames, not
802.11 frames on the wireless interface.

I currently don't have an idea why "iwconfig eth1 channel 11" (or 1)
fails. Can you please verify that setting monitor mode worked and have a
look at the output of dmesg, whether there are any suspicious messages
when you change the mode.

 Ciao
    Joerg
-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <[email protected]>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.