RE: 0.99 ESP protocol preferences

"Chris Flory" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.ethereal.user
Message-ID <038201c68e78$aacb55b0$4564a8c0@chris>
Guy,

Thanks for your response.

Yeah, my keylen for 3DES-CBC is 168, as it should be with 3x56 bits.  But,
according to RFC2451, it takes into account an extra 24 bits for parity.

I can only do 3DES-168 on my Cisco Concentrator and/or Cisco router.  So,
essentially, I am SOL, unless someone knows how to not make it account for
parity.

Thanks again for your help gentlemen!

-Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Guy Harris
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 5:49 PM
To: Ethereal user support
Subject: Re: [Ethereal-users] 0.99 ESP protocol preferences


On Jun 12, 2006, at 2:09 PM, Chris Flory wrote:

> Ok, I see a problem, it appears I am limited to what I can use as an
> encryption/algorithm option.

At least according to the comments in packet-ipsec.c, your choices are:

	NULL
	TripleDES-CBC [RFC2451] : keylen 192 bits.
	AES-CBC with 128-bit keys [RFC3602] : keylen 128 and 192/256 bits.
	AES-CTR [RFC3686] : keylen 160/224/288 bits. The remaining 32 bits  
will be used as nonce.
	DES-CBC [RFC2405] : keylen 64 bits
	BLOWFISH-CBC : keylen 128 bits.
	TWOFISH-CBC : keylen 128/256 bits.

(that's just cut-and-pasted from the comment).

> I am using ESP/MD5/HMAC-128 for my authenticaton,

For authentication, the comment says:

	NULL
	HMAC-SHA1-96 [RFC2404] : any keylen
	HMAC-MD5-96 [RFC2403] : any keylen
	HMAC-SHA256 : any keylen

and says that AES-XCBC-MAC-96 [RFC3566] is "Not available because no  
implementation found."

> and 3DES-168 for encryption on IPSec.

The only 3DES I see in the first list is 3DES-CBC with a 192-bit key  
length; is 168 the key length you're using?

_______________________________________________
Ethereal-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.