RE: Decoding with an intermediate non recognizedlayer

jose alonso <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.ethereal.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Anders,
the ports are configured manually. There is a TCP connection(s) between some node, with a TCP Port(s) configured, and a central node with a set of TCP Ports assigned to each IP of remote nodes.

Regards,
Alonso.

"Anders Broman (AL/EAB)" <[email protected]> escribió:      
 Hi,
 "TCP ports vary from a  capture to another" is this comunicated by some  other protocol or are the ports configured  manually?
  
 Brg
 Anders
 

  
---------------------------------
 From: [email protected]  [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of jose  alonso
Sent: den 20 juni 2006 18:44
To: Ethereal user  support
Subject: RE: [Ethereal-users] Decoding with an intermediate  non recognizedlayer


 
 Hi,
 the capture is from Ethereal. The octets contain the length of the  rest of the packet (i don't need decode this info, only next layers). TCP ports  vary from a capture to another. Do you suggest write a dissector? isn't there a  more direct (easy) solution?
  
 Thanks,
 Alonso.

"Anders Broman (AL/EAB)"  <[email protected]> escribió:
       Hi,
   If    the output is from some sort of trace tool you could write a dissector which    could strip off those octets. Do they contain some meaningful information    ?
   Packet length?
   Which TCP port(s) are used ?
    
   Brg
   Anders

      
---------------------------------
   From: [email protected]    [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of jose    alonso
Sent: den 20 juni 2006 17:55
To:    [email protected]
Subject: [Ethereal-users] Decoding with    an intermediate non recognized layer


   
   Hi, i have captures of messages following next stack: Phy / Eth / IP /    Tcp / 2 octets / SCCP / RANAP ..., the problem is layer between TCP and SCCP,    consisting of two octets, an unrecognized format that makes impossible    decoding upper layers, which are known for Ethereal.
   Is there any way to configure an : ignore these two octets an continue    decoding from there', or something similar to avoid this 'layer'?
   Maybe some kind of output manipulation to overwrite these octets with    some dummy, but known, header like M3UA...?
   I would thank any idea, i'm new in Ethereal.
    
   Alonso 
      
---------------------------------
   
LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del    Mundo.
Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto.
http://es.voice.yahoo.com    _______________________________________________
Ethereal-users mailing    list
[email protected]
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users


  

---------------------------------
 
LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del  Mundo.
Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto.
http://es.voice.yahoo.com_______________________________________________
Ethereal-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users


 		
---------------------------------

LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo.
Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto.
http://es.voice.yahoo.com

_______________________________________________
Ethereal-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.