Re: Ethereal port naming question.
Joerg Mayer <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Jul 2006 23:18:33 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.ethereal.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 02:00:40PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
> I don't know whether "X" at the beginning of the name would be best,
> though; these days, "X" at the beginning of an new application's name
> isn't used a lot to indicate that it has an X11-based GUI, but in the
> old days of X11, that was used (nowadays, the letters "G" and "K" tend
> to be the ones used for that :-)), so it *might* be a bit confusing.
> I'm not sure what'd be a better version, other than, say, "MacWireshark"
> (although if, as, and when we have an official Aqua-based release, we'll
> probably just call it "Wireshark", just as we call the Windows version
> "Wireshark" and would probably continue to do so even if it didn't use
> any GTK+ code).
aquashark
ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <[email protected]>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.