Re: Ethereal port naming question.

Joerg Mayer wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 02:00:40PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
>> I don't know whether "X" at the beginning of the name would be best, 
>> though; these days, "X" at the beginning of an new application's name 
>> isn't used a lot to indicate that it has an X11-based GUI, but in the 
>> old days of X11, that was used (nowadays, the letters "G" and "K" tend 
>> to be the ones used for that :-)), so it *might* be a bit confusing. 
>> I'm not sure what'd be a better version, other than, say, "MacWireshark" 
>> (although if, as, and when we have an official Aqua-based release, we'll 
>> probably just call it "Wireshark", just as we call the Windows version 
>> "Wireshark" and would probably continue to do so even if it didn't use 
>> any GTK+ code).
> 
> aquashark

Sounds good to me.  Kamil, is there any reason this should be a separate
project, and not integrated with the main release?