Re: Problem: Can't get listofinterfaces: PacketGetAdapterNames: There are no more files. (18)

For some strange reason, my reply from yesterday probably got lost somewhere 
(I cannot see it in the archive...).

In any case...

It's definitely a WinPcap issue. Can you please report a bug as described 
here:

http://www.winpcap.org/bugs.htm

?

Please be sure to use WinPcap 4.0a1 for the bug report, as the log is much 
more detailed.

Have a nice day
GV

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gonze Didier" <[email protected]>
To: "Ethereal user support" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 6:10 AM
Subject: RE: [Ethereal-users] Problem: Can't get listofinterfaces: 
PacketGetAdapterNames: There are no more files. (18)


Temporary my problem has been solved by going back to WinPcap 3.0
I think the problem is really located in WinPcap and not in Ethereal as
I've the same problem when running WinPCap tools standalone.

Still I will try with Wireshark 0.99.2

Regards,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:ethereal-users-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Ulf Lamping
> Sent: vrijdag 28 juli 2006 2:32
> To: Ethereal user support
> Subject: Re: [Ethereal-users] Problem: Can't get list ofinterfaces:
> PacketGetAdapterNames: There are no more files. (18)
>
> Gonze Didier wrote:
> >
> > Can someone help me:
> >
> > I am able to perform one capture with Ethereal but as soon as I try
to
> > perform a second capture trough the Interface as the Options from
> > Capture menu I receive the message:
> >
> > Can't get list of interfaces: PacketGetAdapterNames: There are no
more
> > files. (18)
> >
> > Closing Ethereal doesn't help only reboot the PC allows me to
perform
> > one new trace.
> >
> > I have tried with
> >
> > Ethereal 0.10.12 with WinPcap 3.1 beta4
> >
> > Ethereal 0.99.0
> >
> > With WinPcap 3.1, WinPCap 3.1 beta4 WinPCap 4.0 alpha1
> >
> > OS is Windows XP Pro.
> >
> First of all, you may try Wireshark 0.99.2, that's where the
development
> continues.
>
> I don't know it that'll fix your problems, however it should be the
> first step to fix it :-)
>
> Please report it on the Wireshark mailing lists, if it helped or not.
>
> Regards, ULFL
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users

_______________________________________________
Ethereal-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users