Re: [MailServer Notification]Content Filtering Notification
Seymour Dupa <[email protected]> Thu, 21 Sep 2006 07:23:44 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.ethereal.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
------------------- The Ethereal project is being continued at a new site. Please go to http://www.wireshark.org and subscribe to [email protected]. Don't forget to unsubscribe from this list at http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users ------------------- I understand more now. Thank you. --- Joerg Mayer <[email protected]> wrote: > ------------------- > The Ethereal project is being continued at a new > site. Please go to > http://www.wireshark.org and subscribe to > [email protected]. > Don't forget to unsubscribe from this list at > http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users > ------------------- >=20 > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:39:44AM -0700, Gerald > Combs wrote: > > Well, considering that the original message seems > to have originated > > from a system we have no control over: > >=20 > > Received: from mail pickup service by > mailserver.solutionnet.net with > > Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:28:53 > +0530 > >=20 > > and then delivered through a mailing list on > _another_ server which may > > no longer be maintained, I'm not sure what sort of > useful answer we can > > give other than to either ignore the messages, > filter them out, or > > unsubscribe from the list. > >=20 > > As far as I know, there is no machine in the > ethereal.com domain named > > "mailserver". There is also no "the rule2" which > can be violated. > >=20 > > Seymour Dupa wrote: > > > ------------------- > > > The Ethereal project is being continued at a new > site. Please go to > > > http://www.wireshark.org and subscribe to > [email protected]. > > > Don't forget to unsubscribe from this list at > > > > http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users > > > ------------------- > > >=20 > > > Thank you for a non-answer. > > >=20 > > > --- Joerg Mayer <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Ignore the rule problem and do what the remark > above > > >> each message says. >=20 > Sigh. It is completely possible that one of the > mailman rules drops the > mail. It is also a fact that I don't care and that > any time spent on > investigating the problem is *a complete waste of > time* (thus the "Sigh" > at the beginning of my answer, which in and by > itself feels like a waste > of time). >=20 > Let me just give you a picture of what happended: >=20 > You have a bank where they have some sort of mailbox > where you can deposit > money transaction orders in case you come at non > opening hours.=20 > One day you come along and want to put a large > envelope in there with > lots and lots of orders. It's so big that it doesn't > fit into the > mailbox slot. There's also a sign saying that the > bank has moved and > that it isn't doing any further business in this > area and it isn't > looking into this specific mailbox any more. That's > the moment when you > come into the play and complain that your envelope > doesn't fit into the > mailbox slot - not caring that *even if you managed > to get the envelope > in there* the bank wouldn't receive that envelope. >=20 > So, please send your mail to the new address, and in > case that the new > setup still has the problem *then* please report it > for the new site and > we will investigate - we have a very good record of > caring about that > kind of problems. So, just to return the courtesy to > you: Thanks for > reporting a non-problem. >=20 > Regards > Joerg >=20 > --=20 > Joerg Mayer =20 > <[email protected]> > We are stuck with technology when what we really > want is just stuff that > works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead > of technology. > _______________________________________________ > Ethereal-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users >=20 Endings must come before new beginnings.