Re: Data messages
Meredydd <[email protected]> Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:28:47 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.everybuddy.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday 24 June 2004 17:47, Rodney Dawes wrote: > On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 17:21 +0100, Meredydd wrote: > > CCing this back to the list, as I'm not the only one with an > > interest in this (sorry, this list doesn't munge reply-to). > > Heh. Use "Reply to All" next time? :) Indeed, you should have done. > > Umm...what do you mean by that? HTTP Auth is a crummy model, in my > > opinion, because it's designed to carry authentication over a > > request-based protocol, with the wrong party (the client rather > > than the server) initiating... > > I meant the Domain/User/Password model. Oh, right. Um, I'm not so sure about that, actually - it doesn't fit too well into what we've got. The user/domain part is pretty fixed, given that handle+service is the unique ID of a local account. All we really want is a password, isn't it? > > Hmm. Incidentally, what do you need from the core before you can do > > that? > > The UI needs to be able to get buddy icons. Oh, wibble. This is going to be...interesting. None of the service *libraries* currently support buddy icons, let alone the core plumbing. * AIM/ICQ - using an old, effectively orphaned TOC library. To support buddy icons: We would need to integrate libfaim or something like it. * MSN - Using my libmsn, which has now been taken over by Mark Roww. To support buddy icons: Mark needs to implement handling for the SIP bits of MSNP8. This is...non-trivial. * Yahoo - Using libyahoo2, Craig's patch. Does Yahoo even support buddy icons? I know it supports webcams, and I suppose it would be possible to use the last webcam image, but can we do any better? * IRC - Does not support buddy icons. There's also the matter of possibly emulating buddy icons for services which don't support it... Meredydd