Re: Win32 Cygwin Binary

Hi,

Meredydd,

I would go with a non-cygwin binary. It will be better in the long run.

I have the core changes ready, just working on the link stage now.

-Edward

On Thu, 2003-05-01 at 11:27, Meredydd Luff wrote:
> On Thursday 01 May 2003 15:57, Stuart Longland wrote:
> > No changes were made, this is the stock alpha 8 code.
> >
> > I unpacked the tarball into /usr/src and ran:
> > $ ./configure --prefix=/usr && make all install
> In which case, adding --with-static-all to the configure command should make 
> that work completely, pending Edward's support for dynamic linking.
> 
> Meredydd