Re: .so.0.0.0 files not required

On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Philip S Tellis wrote:

> I think eb-lite is still young enough to do this safely.  One would 
> typically find that the kind of people who use alpha software are 
> largely geeks who could fix this problem themselves, or at the least, 
> report it.
> 
> Judging from what happened on the ayttm list when we made this change, 
> we'll get several segfault reports in the first week or so, and then it 
> should be clean.
> 
> Another solution may be to just change the path without prompting the
> user.  This is only a problem if there are third party modules available 
> for eb-lite.

You have a point on the Alpha thing. I am still adding the gui functionality,
though, seeing as we are going to need it eventually for allowing us to
optionally track eb-lite usage.

-- 
Craig West         Ph: (416) 666-1645	|  It's not a bug,
[email protected]              	|  It's a feature...