Re: conversation history
Graham Booker <[email protected]> Sun, 28 Mar 2004 23:28:41 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.fire.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yeah, I was about to say I think XML requires a single root element. Actually, the img tag is correct in the code (has the space before the />), but I modified it in the version I pasted here because it was <img src="file:///....." /> and that will not be the logging format. I just haven't gotten around to fixing the logging yet. Writing is easy, but reading isn't. Maybe I will have to resort to making my own HTML parser. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Graham Booker Texas A&M University [email protected] Graduate Student in ELEN ------------------------------------------------------------------ On Mar 28, 2004, at 9:13 PM, Robert Hailey wrote: > Well, after playing with it, I think what Graham has is probably the > best that can be done, the parsers require a wrapping tag. > > I tried viewing in my web browser (Camino), and while I saw the > primary text, I didn't see the effects of the font tags, neither the > line breaks. > > Writing the close tag is not such a dire problem as I thought. I > thought we would have to be closing an arbitrary number of tags, but > checking for the </log> tag would not be so bad even if in the middle > of a search. In fact the only thing that I noticed was that there was > not a space before the close of the <img /> tag, which I thought was > also required, but at least Camino's parser didn't have a problem > with. > > -- > Robert Hailey > > > On Mar 27, 2004, at 1:49 PM, Graham Booker wrote: > >> OK, here is a format that I was thinking about. This is an example >> irc conversation where meetoo joins the room, thischat, and says >> "Hey". The response is "Yo" followed by a "How is it going?" >> (Indented to look prettier) >> >> <?xml version="1.0"?> >> <log began="2004-03-26 22:04:30 -0600"> >> <event id="0" occurred="2004-03-26 22:04:39 -0600"> >> <font color="#00ff00" style="background-color: #ffffff >> ;font-size: 11"><b> >> <sender>irc</sender> >> <timestamp> (10:04:37 PM): </timestamp> >> </b></font> >> <message service="yes"> >> <img internalName="LoggedOn_small.tiff"/> >> <font color="#555555" style="background-color: #ffffff; >> font-size: 10">meetoo has joined thischat</font> >> </message> >> </event> >> <br /> >> <envelope id="1"> >> <font color="#0000ff" style="background-color: #ffffff; >> font-size: 11"><b> >> <sender>meetoo</sender> >> <timestamp> (10:04:48 PM): </timestamp> >> </b></font> >> <message received="2004-03-26 22:04:50 -0600"> >> <font style="font-size: 10">Hey</font> >> </message> >> </envelope> >> <br /> >> <envelope id="2"> >> <font color="#ff0000" style="background-color: #ffffff; >> font-size: 11"><b> >> <sender self="yes">Me</sender> >> <timestamp> (10:04:52 PM): </timestamp> >> </b></font> >> <message received="2004-03-26 22:04:54 -0600"> >> <font color="#0000d5" style="font-size: 10">Yo</font> >> </message> >> <br /> >> <message received="2004-03-26 22:05:02 -0600"> >> <font color="#0000d5" style="font-size: 10">How is it >> going?</font> >> </message> >> </envelope> >> </log> >> >> Now, the real thing is not well formatted, but rammed together. This >> log is 1147 bytes on disk. This should contain all the information >> that we could possibly need. This will not only display in a web >> browser, but will display well as it is using proper html for >> background color and font-size (at least as far as I know html, any >> comments?). This is also a valid XML file (It was all generated by a >> modified version of Fire). >> >> It also looks really nice in Safari. >> >> I am thinking about doing the following for saving: Open the file, >> fseek to the end (mines 7 or 18 (depending on if this is from the >> same sender as the last) bytes or so), write, close. This is fairly >> safe, and fire could try to repair on a failure induced by a system >> crash (by simply closing tags left open). >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Graham Booker Texas A&M University >> [email protected] Graduate Student in ELEN >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> On Mar 25, 2004, at 10:16 AM, Robert Hailey wrote: >> >>> At first, I thought that changing the log format at this time is not >>> really worth the effort. Web browsers can most likely be 'trained' >>> to read a fire file if that is what you want, the same way other >>> plugin file types are done. And if a major benefit to converting to >>> xml would be ability to convert it to HTML, converting the current >>> format to proper HTML (for viewing not in real time for storage) I >>> would think to be trivial. >>> >>> However, if we change log formats the ability to store extra >>> metadata in a usable way (like for a time constraint search) is a >>> really valuable benefit. Jeremy's idea is probably the best quick >>> patch (to encode it in inert html tags). >>> >>> Speaking to Graham's idea, being able to store logs in xhtml would >>> probably be the ultimate solution... If we didn't want to write the >>> logs a single line at a time, which I really think we should try and >>> stick to. If we try and always write a complete xhtml file, there >>> will surely be times when the program fails; not only in development >>> environments (like breaking the program in debugging), but in the >>> real world (like if the clients computer goes to sleep and never >>> wakes up). That condition is unavoidable, but I claim that the log >>> files certainly must be stored in a consistent manner. If we claim >>> that the logs should be xml parsable, they all should be. >>> >>> I see three ways that the issue can be resolved. >>> >>> The first would be to not store any of the log files in xhtml, as >>> there would surely be some files that will not be proper xhtml, and >>> if necessary provide a simple means to generate a proper xhtml file. >>> Even if it means storing the logs in xhtml minus the closing tags, >>> they all should be done that way. A make file, or fire command could >>> even be made to easily convert them (e.g. cat ${file}.xhtm_ >>> trailer.sub > ${file}.xhtml). If this is done, then the log >>> mechanism will not be significantly different at all; even if we >>> store it as we do now, use a psuedo-xhtml, or has anyone thought >>> about storing logs in LaTeX ? >>> >>> A second way would be to validate the log files on fire's startup. >>> We could then have valid xhtml logs, but the program would have to >>> make sure that they are consistent. Checking the most recent log in >>> each subdirectory and repairing it if necessary. Anyone want to code >>> this? >>> >>> A third way is a mix of the above two, and that is to have parallel >>> log files (e.g. *.session3 and *.xhtml files). Then we could always >>> write the xml file at the closing of a session3 file and never have >>> an xhtml file that is invalid while maintaining line item writing of >>> session files. To have fire utilize the preexisting utilities to >>> parse xhtml files, before it does a search that would require them, >>> it generates the xhtml files that are not already there. Notice that >>> not writing the file until the close is important so that fire does >>> not have to worry about 'updating' xhtml files. But there could >>> still be an option in the 'complex' search dialog to rebuild these >>> files. >>> >>> -- >>> Robert Hailey >>> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > fire-development mailing list > fire-development-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fire-development >
smime.p7s
(application/pkcs7-signature, 2.3 KB) - not displayed