Re: CVS now considered unstable
Alex Perez <[email protected]> Wed, 21 Apr 2004 17:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.fire.devel,gmane.network.fire.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Graham, Just out of curiosity, what was the major change? Also, could you by chance tell me what 10.3-specific things Fire 1.0 uses? And are there many/any in your "major" patch? Cheers, and thanks in advance, Alex Perez GNUstepper On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Graham Booker wrote: > Those of you who like to run from CVS, beware. I just put in a MAJOR > commit that I wanted to hold off so that it didn't get into 1.0. This > commit is only moderately tested so it may cause you problems. If you > decide to run this version, don't gripe if things go wrong ;). > > If you want the source code for version 1.0, use "cvs -j > Fire-1-0-Update update" > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Graham Booker Texas A&M University > [email protected] Graduate Student in ELEN > ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click