Re: Fire 0.32.g on 10.3 release

Thanks for the help... I have checked in a change on TOT that should 
resolve this issue.

-    if ([[NSNumber numberWithInt:0] isEqualToNumber:[proxyDict 
objectForKey:(NSString *)kSCPropNetProxiesHTTPSEnable]]) {
+    if ([[proxyDict objectForKey:(NSString 
*)kSCPropNetProxiesHTTPSEnable] boolValue] == NO) {

-Jason

On Oct 25, 2003, at 8:02 PM, Greg Rumple wrote:
> Yeah, but I don't think it makes it that far, in that I believe it 
> throws an exception of some type and never returns from that code 
> properly (at least in my case, I never made it past that line).
>
> Greg
>
> --
> Greg Rumple
> grumple-jOMaxo/[email protected]
> On Oct 25, 2003, at 7:31 PM, Jason Townsend wrote:
>
>> On Oct 25, 2003, at 6:38 PM, Greg Rumple wrote:
>>> So I got my copy of Panther yesterday, installed it, and attempted 
>>> to use Fire 0.32.g and it didn't connect to MSN any more.
>>>
>>> So I checked out the Fire-0-32-Update tree from sourceforge and 
>>> built it to figure out what's broke.
>>>
>>> After a few things (removing -traditional-cpp from the cflags in a 
>>> couple of places), I was able to get it built.  I than attempted to 
>>> use the debugger and interestingly enough, Fire actually exposes a 
>>> bug in xcode's gdb.  So I ran gdb from the command line and told it 
>>> to ignore the error and go on anyway, and was able to isolate the 
>>> problem.  So the ext_get_https_proxy routine calls a loosely 
>>> documented (it does exist on developer.apple.com, but that's about 
>>> the only place I can find it) api called SCDynamicStoreCopyProxies 
>>> which appears to actually always return data even when there are NO 
>>> proxies defined.  So skipping this call to ext_get_https_proxy and 
>>> setting proxy = NULL I was able to get connected to MSN again.
>>>
>>> I'll take a look a bit later and see if they didn't go ahead and 
>>> update the internet config API to provide this information.
>>
>> Thanks for the investigative work... I have actually had success 
>> connecting to MSN on Panther, so perhaps this is not a 100% thing... 
>> but it did occur to me in looking at that code that we should check 
>> to make sure there is actually a port and server defined for the 
>> proxy before returning non NULL from that function.
>>
>> -Jason
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
>> Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open
>> Source Community?  Make a contribution, and help us add new
>> features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
>> _______________________________________________
>> fire-development mailing list
>> fire-development-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fire-development
>>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
> Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open
> Source Community?  Make a contribution, and help us add new
> features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> fire-development mailing list
> fire-development-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fire-development



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open
Source Community?  Make a contribution, and help us add new
features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/