Re: Fire status correspondence
Graham Booker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.fire.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
You have invisible wrong for AIM! 0.32 series, you are not logged off, but as of the time that was written, not letting any buddies see you was the closest AIM could do. As a result, you cannot see your buddies because of how AIM worked, but, if you put yourself in your buddy list, go invisible on AIM, you can see and message yourself! You are still connected to the servers, will still accumulate online time, etc... 0.99.3 invisible works on AIM! You appear to log off to others, but you can message them, and if their client lets them send messages to those it doesn't see as online, they can message you. On Mar 24, 2004, at 12:26 PM, Nik wrote: > I spent some time today experimenting with Fire and with the various > statuses available on all the supported services. As there is not a > 1:1 correlation between each status, I figured diagramming the > important ones would be effort well spent. It would be nice if this > information could be added to the FAQ, too. > > Of particularly note is the hinky way Invisibility is handled (or not > handled) for AIM and for Jabber. It's less than full-featured privacy. > :) > > Not sure if this list accepts images, if not, you can find the png > (it's tiny, don't worry) at: > > <http://homepage.mac.com/inik/files/Fire%20Status%20Correspondence.png> > > <Fire Status Correspondence.png> > > All of these tests were performed with Fire 0.32m, and 0.99.3b. There > didn't seem to be any difference between them in this regard. For the > other clients, I used the latest Windows releases of each, and > MyJabber for the Jabber client.
smime.p7s
(application/pkcs7-signature, 2.3 KB) - not displayed