Re: Fire status correspondence

Graham Booker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.fire.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
You have invisible wrong for AIM!

0.32 series, you are not logged off, but as of the time that was 
written, not letting any buddies see you was the closest AIM could do.  
As a result, you cannot see your buddies because of how AIM worked, 
but, if you put yourself in your buddy list, go invisible on AIM, you 
can see and message yourself!  You are still connected to the servers, 
will still accumulate online time, etc...

0.99.3 invisible works on AIM!  You appear to log off to others, but 
you can message them, and if their client lets them send messages to 
those it doesn't see as online, they can message you.

On Mar 24, 2004, at 12:26 PM, Nik wrote:

> I spent some time today experimenting with Fire and with the various 
> statuses available on all the supported services. As there is not a 
> 1:1 correlation between each status, I figured diagramming the 
> important ones would be effort well spent. It would be nice if this 
> information could be added to the FAQ, too.
>
> Of particularly note is the hinky way Invisibility is handled (or not 
> handled) for AIM and for Jabber. It's less than full-featured privacy. 
> :)
>
> Not sure if this list accepts images, if not, you can find the png 
> (it's tiny, don't worry) at:
>
> <http://homepage.mac.com/inik/files/Fire%20Status%20Correspondence.png>
>
> <Fire Status Correspondence.png>
>
> All of these tests were performed with Fire 0.32m, and 0.99.3b. There 
> didn't seem to be any difference between them in this regard. For the 
> other clients, I used the latest Windows releases of each, and 
> MyJabber for the Jabber client.
smime.p7s (application/pkcs7-signature, 2.3 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.