Re: Variable states by buddy
Elektron <elektron_rc5-FFYn/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.fire.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> What do the rest of you think? Is the ability to set yourself > selectively online worthwhile? Would it be handy to let unwanted > messages just queue up somehow for later review? I want to see a window with a list of conversations down the left and the boxes on the right (something like how Proteus does things). 18 windows is a little much. And queued messages could appear there. A fundamental problem is that queued messages may not appear anywhere if you crash. > I think this sort of feature could be terribly useful for some people, > and might really break some new ground for Fire if implemented in a > later release. I'm not sure how much code it would require, but it's > mostly just working off of current technologies. It's still impossible (given current protocols) to set who sees you as busy or not. The most you can do is send auto-replies (and do you appear as online or busy?). - Purr ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Fire-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fire-talk Have a question? Please read the Fire Frequently Asked Questions: http://fire.sourceforge.net/faq.shtml