Re: Fire status correspondence

That is OK, just wanted to help you correct it.

Hehe, actually the AIM beta (I don't know which one, but a friend told 
me this) can go invisible.  I did it by sending the ICQ invisible 
packet (AIM and ICQ are merging).  I also changed it so that it will 
send messages to those who are offline because they may be invisible.  
The server bounces the message if they are really offline.  The 
invisible is not perfect on AIM though.  If a friend of mine goes 
invisible, I can detect if they are offline or really invisible.  Maybe 
they will fix their servers in the future.

On Mar 24, 2004, at 2:41 PM, Nik wrote:

> How weird. I'm SURE I checked that in both versions, since I found the 
> behavior so weird in 0.32m! I guess I did and forgot to update my 
> spreadsheet, or I didn't and thought I did... Oy, my bad. Anyhow, 
> here's a new table, representing 0.99b.
>
> Also of note is that Jabber is handling invisibility correctly. It 
> appears that I can go invisible on all five services now! (Which is 
> weird considering that the AIM client itself doesn't allow for 
> invisibility. Strange!)
>
> <Fire status correspondence mk.2.png>