Re: Financial allocation poll stage 3

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
> Ian Clarke writes:
>
> > One example that sticks out is this justification for saying a website
> redesign
> > would have absolutely zero value: "We have just redesigned it. Throwing
> that
> > away too soon would disappoint the volunteer authors". I find this
> rationale
> > infuriating.
>
> You ask for the value people assess for features. I think you have to
> live with honest answers, though you don’t need to agree with them.
>

I agree.


> There is no way to use this poll as a basis for any "rational" decision,
> but that was clear before we started. At best it provides a picture of
> the range of opinions in the project.


I disagree, and you had more than enough opportunity to offer your feedback
on this proposed approach months ago when I first proposed it.  Suggesting
an alternative at this late stage is unhelpful.  While your proposal makes
very little sense to me, I'm not going to get into a debate over it, the
time for that was several months ago.

Ian.


-- 
Ian Clarke
Founder, The Freenet Project
Email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl