Re: Financial allocation poll stage 3

Ian writes:

> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab-S0/[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> @Ian: can you make a clear statement that this will not be used as
>> justification that we “must” take a given decision?
>
> We are not robots, and we do not need to robotically obey the results of
> this prioritization process if they don't make sense for one reason or
> another, but it would need to be a good reason.

Do I understand your wording correctly as meaning that whatever the
outcome of the process, we need a good reason not to follow it — and
that you do not consider the weaknesses I already described as good
reasons?

Best wishes,
Arne
-- 
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein
ohne es zu merken

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=e8LX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----