Re: Financial allocation poll stage 3
Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab-S0/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] writes: > So how about we just try the procedure as is, and postpone requests for a > different one until it is finished and has actually failed obviously? As you saw, I did answer to the poll. And I provided concrete suggestions how we can try to get the most value from the poll. That should already give enough of a hint how I’m taking it. Even where I don’t agree with how specifics are planned. I think that asking the community is a good thing, even though I don’t think we’re doing it as well as possible, and even though I don’t think that trying to use that as direct input for a decision algorithm is a good idea. Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 818 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXo6/RAAoJEBPvjUUkA8PrV90QAMQ8KTfS9PcwK57+LfHnsYpW CANK1aSZ554HVmKzURmnZgp+svfgQImSgWVmIbiGiZ3XvzChyaoqGj7gpjXuBRho w9RIt/ALAZIpm6MqTW3LZWl8Y4zJMxLQJfCq56WwjXeYx7rse8kC8xJ0MNd8ow0V XdVNib72L+itKA3D2/wMFyo8ihCLGNgxZdpQPfQWZvO6xAHOk5rVfIWl0MRmm0Pg 9pSn55JHpCeQ6Vi5c80XIR5VjLHl+e25K7+PHn+3yQAaDwLLlhVmxfY4CNBN308L sdRvDCcwFKIg3DLsjfY+gB3BQdyLhj2Ach1JhLyUXc6NK0LBWOSmgR10qlRvmZ+7 eTvVK3/Lqn/FEgE6RDqt1JByBEz/D/AhY45mqNBWUsfe1w1m06MiH0Rocw2eUsVG mPh9aDqctYcXQVuhqG/m3SW2+FciViMzeZAqR8iUZWKXBvUi4f/V0gF22h59dRfE snTiqMFA/Ps51H1Ziuqah2pZRrcqf79EHa+NI8ngjBLs2xi66DbuJ4+69iOS20VN iOO6ppd9UyuqoZc1eYBOVde1xUtp9uCeFj/YX3LaT9ANzlQeOKb4l6KOYKEbXBB2 dieUioc+BH6/V9/2pLzFTRJGpwyu4mCJsvO3g9CIJ9TFB0bxlQUS4+5+tNwJn7aA 6BcP4tyf1BtDr6O3t14m =nzxY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----