Re: Should we just go ahead and redesign the website?
Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab-S0/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ian Clarke writes: > When I've raised the subject of a website redesign in the past, the only voices > I heard in response were opposed to it. > But it appears that some people agreed with me yet remained silent at the time, > giving me the misleading impression that I had a minority view. I did not remain silent. A year ago I said we should not do it *right now* (an embargo). A few months ago I said it needs to be done right. This is what I also said today. One way to do it right would be to make a new *landing page*, i.e. https://get.freenetproject.org That would keep all existing inbound links working and avoid putting more work on volunteers. Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 818 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXphU9AAoJEBPvjUUkA8PrxD0P/ip5vAQ+1KNx/J7g0XCwaOhf Mn+EXTMjQbkDgLjTgiuLtZJ6FtjzboHnt+lSuqghjquNA2ADMZONGWfllUOM/6IB lRgFeixN6kGdXjMAocsvqCPttSLopF3BMrwuANao2ZXGVGzzPbDpCwoUOaDALkSS YoplBwCSttW8mC9rxAmQ02su4ZxXsHpGtoKD7sK2ubxO8fnTsEmrMKJMutJ6IK+a MrOQQdb+K5wkFdn4q3lBpZdL+/Guu0+xBWSCAB5ZASKkmFBH2r7oZcvvt65bKJQP OIb8OsZmA2/xlWev3pSZQL6gPJWRtEvmtI1BVKgj2h0NU2/AmjyGXdmvNe/d8gHA qIO5S/n9Vp+5uqLQfE6oga3rxA1KyMZ1NJrmS6QXISkFenKy4EIPegOAAeYRYEYp ybfvnmxGMllBP0ckT6GyjV/6EAAK56bs9pFSTYcKElxEswikZJOlnFGJbeVCeIwS km7sDl9Nnbg0medbcF5m3OuePBjoLFuONCe+cyHHSjr67BS2zuNkIZs73eM6CVhw PvAF9PAYL55PFpTwhNiJzCopMKcgQJ8R84imknU75rv3cvSpFU5pjnQWfU0g+ZrH A4q8IpIVyHPNMM60EwIT5YQW6PwtU03yJ4emKJJT/kmcPfMAppAydNHU7L4ahubS 4BdZPcjzKZcodCFJJYfa =NZdd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----