Re: Should we just go ahead and redesign the website?

Dan Roberts <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.freenet.devel
Message-ID <CAKwYL5H+N1b1DY8vKBxpXTfCY_Ow5KYfKs-ea506srLTKzX3cg@mail.gmail.com>
+1 to <2.5k allocation to website redesign.

Converting a design into html and CSS is not worth paying for in my
opinion. I'm happy to volunteer my time for that task, it's also not a rare
skill.

Thanks,
Dan

On Aug 6, 2016 9:03 AM, "Ian Clarke" <[email protected]> wrote:

> When I've raised the subject of a website redesign in the past, the only
> voices
> I heard in response were opposed to it.
> But it appears that some people agreed with me yet remained silent at the
> time,
> giving me the misleading impression that I had a minority view.
> I'm happy to carve off up-to $5k of that $25k right now, commission a new
> design
> on 99designs (probably around $1k), get a service like
> https://thesiteslinger.com/ to convert it to HTML (probably a few hundred
> $$ -
> I've worked with them before, they're good), and from there we can set it
> up,
> perhaps using Github Pages.
> I think we should reduce the amount of content on the main website
> significantly, limiting it to user-focussed content like explaining what
> Freenet
> is and how to use it.
> Developer docs and other more detailed information can be migrated to
> Github
> wiki and linked from the main website.
> This can be handled separately to the prioritization process.
> Thoughts?
> Ian.
> Ian Clarke
> Founder, The Freenet Project
> Email: [email protected]
> _______________________________________________
> Devl mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.