Re: Should we just go ahead and redesign the website?

On Sat, 2016-08-06 at 21:12 +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> On Saturday, August 06, 2016 07:58:30 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > 
> > If not, then how about setting a deadline (like august 11th, in one
> > week) and after that deadline checking how people perceive the
> > value of
> > redesigning the website.
> 
> The poll algorithm does *not* work like that.
> The stage we are at is *not* the last one. There will be one more
> stage (of 1 
> week as well).
> 
> The last stage will be to have another vote about estimated cost of 
> development.
> I.e. in this stage now, we vote for how valuable / important / useful
> the 
> tasks are.
> In the next stage, we will vote on how much money everyone estimates
> their 
> development to consume.
> 
> The decision on what to do first will then be made as:
> Divide average task value by average estimated cost.
> Sort by the result. Do the thing with the highest value/cost first.
> 
> So we would first to the things which have the "most bang for the
> buck", i.e. 
> highest value per cost.
> 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_decision-making#CriticismFlorent

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAABCAAGBQJXptEvAAoJEOrF6/B6qcKjA34IAKGg/7AGgebCiDn12G9/M3pd
ROtOYqYUdESZE/J9RNGOItotIkA/PMlIWlgwsg/+6NxPOyrS+Hs53pcB0oeb6QdH
hu0jj2gpSe9tSbJ8me9P4CF/KHDnFSlO7vRgvMLI83xKGzQUrGJQTQGzF2yPpGhK
fFCsmHlihpBjiej58Q3wN0RDSM50JVilD343mL8fQkrTwCCJUv3+7IAUlf934qn9
NWUdz5uqOub2PH8gL4UDy8gmvBL98rXcbMATi0EFFRIcMLDpt+7hVeFl6I34EXRt
7tQMbqfn/fQrZeavgeWbTIlRq8Cfqv9p8CCaeiCUcgWyLgCnkMk4rswrFm27W68=
=3P/Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----