Re: Financial allocation poll stage 3
Matthew Toseland <mjt92-KWPb1pKIrIJaa/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 28/08/16 19:29, Ian wrote: > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Matthew Toseland <mjt92-KWPb1pKIrIJaa/[email protected]> wrote: > >> Asking us not to take into account the technical >> difficulty of each task when prioritizing arguably > That's not what was asked. My prioritization proposal separates the > estimation of the value of completing a task from the estimation of the > task's cost. These can then be combined later to come up with a > prioritization. Which will inherently prefer "easy wins". Which is probably a good thing. Some of the proposals are "WTF, why didn't you just send a patch" though. :) > Ian. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 819 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXwy45AAoJEBzu1zFxXR53FhMP/itIbSUarcFL4xP2fB0boYtA tTcHq+AVYxVL8g0WKJ6rzyHD5ZiE40CWUYPzgDNwOk+GxibgQVMkuWDMQHYMYHgy I7C2UN7bK/rscn5ncwLYXAWMDJHWxzDlY0jzGRmSrV0XbC0BAnSUWLYYx/8sBq/b 7eMv2m3L5fM83Sd/iO4LorZ+m9cxx/DmLbE43vhz1z9lE4WnpXRmQpUPQ0YlcLO5 s9j0x5FpaoMjierqbepm6zkmd69HZy7fjV/jswzJv7ZicAaPdxWa+z/MhHLCCW8M 2c8+dbUP2BdPJT02azrwmzY/rYAKRvfb2Zejp0eJULgKo2XwrmJds7asT7QYxuhz vPy2VQ8bYRYOYimd+X/ddIczG5BD/ZL/HTrQ4ms5CDpdMl+W+It3bMWVdlHKhaL2 ukRSRI5XnvpoW7u91eIe2vkIevab1Ww2y4nyh1FAOkq3/i/33XD31nOjqKgUUmlk +vvL0c6eXiEOsEAITlzfpVO1lVisy+ZW1MmgWTEhha4GwyST9CDmyXRINAq9w/oG 7LebCJ8vdvJ6unCHwi/5E9KfHeNwqOKLJFX77HRXuf5mLCveNCtkSnxNsqH8oAxD 7Q6QQflmwkFj2JFhJ6YCGBnsTSL2kV+oKfTaofUnwHQEtXfWdMZCTZ6OdDVaEpoy PiA60tnE8cQQ2wlYLOCv =hRNe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----