Re: Fake GPG key attack on a Freenet developer
Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab-S0/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Arne Babenhauserheide writes: > CHK@l8aO0YagdQ4bdPqvjL45MsR2vpzWJ-a-w2wOhK-u5Ho,qxABwPVUloiBoZixQE9wYpcp2ciaeas-cfkzeblVRys,AAMC--8/task-planning-poll-methods-6a3055856f8d.tar > > The results from the different methods are printed and also stored in > ranks.html: > > CHK@AEQzah66XDh5mAbkcjVqLXUICPhGIl1wopFQ-tCQWrs,fWauCz7RHTbAn5oSsbvAtA8cAW~xmJ8Fz3Lpi3XKcaU,AAMC--8/ranks.html > > CHK@yvVhx5La74vTl1-VFnkc2KN9hsFCsumay2dhbMYr73k,5ObUTp9Sfdiidmm7RyBTzFR0GPvQl5ZzLh0jHsSzXoo,AAMC--8/ranks.csv Note that the "least contested" method isn’t well-suited for actual decision-taking. It’s in here because it provides interesting insights, but if it were used to evaluate which decisions to take (with pre-defined evaluation method), giving a higher value to something you deem important could actually move it downwards. That’s not the case for the other methods. When ignoring "least contested", there are only 6 points which are in the top ten for each of the evaluation methods (marked with (!!) if it is not in the top ten of least contested): - WoT first iteration (!!) - Friend Requests - Single-use node references - FOAF connection suggestions - Migrate fred to Gradle - Plugin Data encryption (!!) I can repeat these tests for different groups of people (volunteer-devs, volunteer/employee-devs¹, users). ¹: volunteers including xor. volunteer-devs: CHK@con1-u8iFJLBrjSjdfTRAeQccWrfZQXp1W4Bl7VDVWE,CqjNK9i44YuPXxz9IQWgUHh7iWylGn8GgAcnw9YB4nI,AAMC--8/volunteer-dev-ranks.html volunteer-devs and employees: CHK@oOmwKgJikfECg-jBuBnoc6~l9QYFL8tmy~4ngJ9nzzY,gCZG4rEY2C6Gkdv3yjcHxJvOKq-HcybbhCHuw0-inIM,AAMC--8/volunteer-dev-and-employee-ranks.html users: CHK@OhqMBaXH~1jfCgGmkkvUvDh4xiSYX6Y~hIFvaP9bVgU,1o-tdrP~xvBxjvjB0cD5JhPXJaAwdBdLIZ4I95G1cOM,AAMC--8/users-ranks.html (I did not yet look at these) Best wishes, Arne > Best wishes, > Arne > > [email protected] writes: > >> On Monday, September 26, 2016 05:08:35 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >>> does that mean poll4 is formally closed now? >> >> Yes. >> >> But I'm currently still working on putting all stuff into single spreadsheets >> (this is a few hours of work indeed :|) - So if you provide a really good >> reason for why you want to change your estimates, I might accept the changes >> if they come soon enough for me to not have finished the sheets yet. Ian has >> the last call in this though. >> >> I did allocate today for result processing and will allocate tomorrow as well >> if today isn't enough, so be quick please. -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 818 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJX6lquAAoJEBPvjUUkA8PrA6YP/0SeOAvKlmGSv+0SIutv+AXT uN7Un20qSFTu6tYwCoAtniEiVhM2TjcV2hQMi/8ut/df6ALf+iiF1zuqPRPqa9t+ tKHm/Kj1iv+CCeLxTSbCo/7bzs+C9TU59/eP9anZHwNxGmOCSzXtoDr3mqF6n8Sp Dhp3rZQ+P3znhVeyx0DV2PIEXRL2rv7+tLKwp7QB/hTkTE3vCkwVQguMOArDW4Qx X81nToRTyLPjMUc2s9zI80AEh3wEXdCmZnLaHkzGRW5ixFLgPDFtADMa0ljKo6By 8QVW4a7017dKdxQ0zX0rQwjZcfj4bQqkCfUTRiWBUHjtUsjxGQCI8D70wauBrZPU AidHCDp2AysyoIj2Avl7BMSupVCRyJBTEelfvVjnLjg35+zAZZ2KbgiuGc2rbNCH 6wjwY2pnbu5cbQSLgiX4mU3xpECOB67zPY6RuDKvOpU9VXKlHQYlSx3uo3tyV4vT pc0EkT4uuqbRyjpm38BJ2flGWxReNgG9f8UoJDFiNmK14QTZWEa9odGkjjxpQ/8W OgrLxXDv2UUC39X67CxPYmYMsskXU/Piy0+7nf98nCkV7Q25b6LkfDtV0DsA0QGE vd0okpd0/VgI+lI9oFXDpMj7WmCkLbvj78VJAiyINcUfjWr5r78C6OetTb15hTHh K2mcriFW0SybAFY26o/D =AOtg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----