Re: Fake GPG key attack on a Freenet developer

Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab-S0/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.freenet.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:

> CHK@l8aO0YagdQ4bdPqvjL45MsR2vpzWJ-a-w2wOhK-u5Ho,qxABwPVUloiBoZixQE9wYpcp2ciaeas-cfkzeblVRys,AAMC--8/task-planning-poll-methods-6a3055856f8d.tar
> 
> The results from the different methods are printed and also stored in
> ranks.html:
>
> CHK@AEQzah66XDh5mAbkcjVqLXUICPhGIl1wopFQ-tCQWrs,fWauCz7RHTbAn5oSsbvAtA8cAW~xmJ8Fz3Lpi3XKcaU,AAMC--8/ranks.html
>
> CHK@yvVhx5La74vTl1-VFnkc2KN9hsFCsumay2dhbMYr73k,5ObUTp9Sfdiidmm7RyBTzFR0GPvQl5ZzLh0jHsSzXoo,AAMC--8/ranks.csv

Note that the "least contested" method isn’t well-suited for actual
decision-taking. It’s in here because it provides interesting insights,
but if it were used to evaluate which decisions to take (with
pre-defined evaluation method), giving a higher value to something you
deem important could actually move it downwards.

That’s not the case for the other methods.

When ignoring "least contested", there are only 6 points which are in
the top ten for each of the evaluation methods (marked with (!!) if it
is not in the top ten of least contested):

- WoT first iteration (!!)
- Friend Requests 
- Single-use node references
- FOAF connection suggestions
- Migrate fred to Gradle
- Plugin Data encryption (!!)

I can repeat these tests for different groups of people (volunteer-devs,
volunteer/employee-devs¹, users).

¹: volunteers including xor.

volunteer-devs:
CHK@con1-u8iFJLBrjSjdfTRAeQccWrfZQXp1W4Bl7VDVWE,CqjNK9i44YuPXxz9IQWgUHh7iWylGn8GgAcnw9YB4nI,AAMC--8/volunteer-dev-ranks.html


volunteer-devs and employees:
CHK@oOmwKgJikfECg-jBuBnoc6~l9QYFL8tmy~4ngJ9nzzY,gCZG4rEY2C6Gkdv3yjcHxJvOKq-HcybbhCHuw0-inIM,AAMC--8/volunteer-dev-and-employee-ranks.html


users:
CHK@OhqMBaXH~1jfCgGmkkvUvDh4xiSYX6Y~hIFvaP9bVgU,1o-tdrP~xvBxjvjB0cD5JhPXJaAwdBdLIZ4I95G1cOM,AAMC--8/users-ranks.html


(I did not yet look at these)


Best wishes,
Arne

> Best wishes,
> Arne
>
> [email protected] writes:
>
>> On Monday, September 26, 2016 05:08:35 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>>> does that mean poll4 is formally closed now?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> But I'm currently still working on putting all stuff into single spreadsheets
>> (this is a few hours of work indeed :|) - So if you provide a really good 
>> reason for why you want to change your estimates, I might accept the changes 
>> if they come soon enough for me to not have finished the sheets yet. Ian has 
>> the last call in this though.
>>
>> I did allocate today for result processing and will allocate tomorrow as well 
>> if today isn't enough, so be quick please.


-- 
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein
ohne es zu merken

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 818 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=AOtg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.