Re: Fake GPG key attack on a Freenet developer

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.network.freenet.devel
Organization Freenet Project
Message-ID <1606644.zuiJOrjgv0@1337h4x0r>
On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 03:44:01 PM [email protected] wrote:
> [...] potential malicious manipulation attempts in the poll
> results I gathered [...]

PSA about Arne's data:
- The said potentially malicious votes are included in Arne's data.
- Some results are truncated to 0 bytes
- There's also an extra result which I don't know where it came from.
- Also, results of at least two contributors are missing.

-> Please lets not make this subject of the result discussion yet, it's 
incomplete and potentially includes bogus data.



To Arne:

I would be really happy if I could please ask you to have some more patience 
for me to finish the main publication.
I ask for this because volunteering doesn't combine well with the time 
pressure to have to deliver something before someone else does.
This is the environment of a competition, but I'm neither winning a price nor 
being paid for this. So I would enjoy it some more if the work environment 
could be non-competitive.

It should be possible for me to finish the results this week.
You can still post your alternate interpretation then.

It may happen sooner if you tell me you do not expect me to read the 385 line 
Python script before.
Of course it's really nice that you bothered to write that much of Python, but
voting on something can only be democratic if people understand how their vote 
is used. It's questionable whether the participants can be bothered to read 
all that Python. And while Ian's originally proposed method could turn out to 
not be the most sophisticated, it is at least very easy to understand.

I had already some days ago contacted you about your request to use different 
methods for result evaluation and asked *why* they would be better.
So if you want them to be used, perhaps please just provide an answer to that, 
I don't see any yet?

--
hopstolive (keyword for Ians spam filter)

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 836 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=/L93
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.