Re: Fake GPG key attack on a Freenet developer
Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab-S0/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] writes: > On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:37:53 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> > -> Please lets not make this subject of the result discussion yet, it's >> > incomplete and potentially includes bogus data. >> >> That is true, and I already wrote that that’s a possibility. >> >> However that does not invalidate the more important result that using >> only one way to evaluate the poll results in bogus rankings, even if the >> correct data is used. >> >> Each of the different ways to evaluate provides for different means of >> skewing the result, and from what I can tell, these means were used to >> some degree. From their difference between the evaluation methods we can >> at least tell how uncertain the result of the poll is. > > Hmm yes, there are indeed some signs of attempts to skew the results by people > voting for very extreme values. This may be fixed by the median already? > And yes, it would indeed be nice to have some way to deal with them beyond > manually excluding people from voting/estimating > - if we do manually exclude certain estimates the resulting discussion will be > lots of great fun :| > > So overall, I am open to looking at those methods, just *after* trying with > the original poll method first :) > > Let's just shrug this subthread off as a misunderstanding please, ok? > :) This won’t undo my answer to Ian, but otherwise I’ll be glad to do that. I did not intend this as an attack on you, but rather as saving you from spending two days of what sounded like tedious work on something I had already done for fun. Also I don’t mind another implementation. > I'll go to bed now and finish the main spreadsheets ASAP this week. > You'll also get raw CSVs then to experiment with, so if the original method > does not cope well with manipulation you can try to prove it with data then :) Thank you for that! Gathering and validating votes is the part of the work which would be tedious for me, so I’m happy to be able to avoid it :) > Good night & thanks for the clarifications! Have a nice day! Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 818 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJX63UZAAoJEBPvjUUkA8PrZ5gQAKzODFdiqhKnDEpcEwJVvw/j UnxnsgTlOF7VJzr+mbgBMgmBtZ3E3mC925WDZnpV3vNLNZyWT0H+UzEwYE9fTsm0 QZXE72VjimIR+M8UJIf9zfgUP28sPKyStJcsGzmGyJbAo5fXEzpeb7Wqcr0gIU0g 6ps3cMrsUVkFS9AO+nI3Goz0j/jVs51aVJhpgja+uzmPRbW7OPpazNY1ibtqxi37 NR0hSxx+z+3PoH+JRYMKy+EywjXPKG0s8RyXKgKCLxtdOXyiI0Y2xAOe5+hzTgDr letWE8HmIwIDm98qs7juGgedI8VXaasbv+C2fPc/85h1cVM9ZubB7bmIzDQOdEZB GVlZ7MAuCwbGKvWvr4/jPlk88xHMEXoWLC0E5shlbySk/ccduRTTLI3Gj0fJDV7W eqBoz3+KIBWcYp+BIlaadfKq/aZpi2mUUecPz2V2rtsTovXMClt8m9IMaa7lKB7l DxTGFZXL0Ma5VrzRdafkXy613smtocpF+SgJk6F0xFFEwDlEKvNLWKFfSl3WztiL yVmW+mbcRmmUEMgR36mQGcDQsZ2GQ0FF0LxhctXCTJkLi3tozbbdabBRkBkHOD/Z kSfmN8QON+xdNVsczL3YrTyK0FTiiY7wuqBThl6wH9tdHZXNNqo5x4wztC/gfqX3 Oz16SgZRelE3LWPNT/Lp =ToDr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----