Re: poll: start writing offers

Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab-S0/[email protected]> Mon, 30 Jan 2017 21:08:51 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.network.freenet.devel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

[email protected] writes:

> On Saturday, January 28, 2017 04:57:58 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> PS: Finishing the first iteration of the WoT would normally be among
>>     these two (with estimated 2.8 to 4.1 weeks ~ 2800$ to 4100$), but xor
>>     pulled back his votes on that, so I won’t name it here until the
>>     issue is resolved. That need not block the two tasks named here.
>…
> Also, for future discussions, please explicitly mention it when you're using 
> the results from your custom evaluation algorithm,

I said something along the lines of "with any evaluation method". The
email I wrote about the different methods stated, that the way I used to
aggregate the results was to find a set of results which are top ranked
regardless of the method.

> It's just that the procedure of a "democratic" vote should be clearly 
> predefined and not implicitly changed when stating results.

It wasn’t clearly predefined and what was written was easy to
game. That’s why I implemented several evaluations to find a stable set
of top-ranked elements which does not depend on the evaluation method
and is more resilient against gaming.

Finally: I am somewhat cranky, because I have the impression that you’re
missing the point why I did the different evaluations. But I won’t push
that further. No need to stay cranky, there are more important things to
do. Like deciding on the offers.

Best wishes,
Arne
-- 
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein
ohne es zu merken

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 800 B)