Re: poll: start writing offers

On Monday, January 30, 2017 09:08:51 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > Also, for future discussions, please explicitly mention it when you're
> > using the results from your custom evaluation algorithm,
> 
> I said something along the lines of "with any evaluation method". The
> email I wrote about the different methods stated, that the way I used to
> aggregate the results was to find a set of results which are top ranked
> regardless of the method.

Oh sorry, it seems I missed the brackets where you said that!  :(

> > It's just that the procedure of a "democratic" vote should be clearly
> > predefined and not implicitly changed when stating results.
> 
> It wasn’t clearly predefined and what was written was easy to
> game. That’s why I implemented several evaluations to find a stable set
> of top-ranked elements which does not depend on the evaluation method
> and is more resilient against gaming.
> 
> Finally: I am somewhat cranky, because I have the impression that you’re
> missing the point why I did the different evaluations. But I won’t push
> that further. No need to stay cranky, there are more important things to
> do. Like deciding on the offers.

Fair enough :)

Please don't feel offended, I didn't mean to criticize the fact that you did 
alternate evaluations, that's a good idea, I just want it to be clear which 
method was used when results are being discussed.
I don't want to dispute scientific sanity of your methods by any means!

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=CJ9I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----