Re: DDG Tasks Bug Bounty Proposal
Matthew Toseland <[email protected]> Sat, 6 May 2017 12:36:54 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 06/05/17 10:53, Steve Dougherty wrote: > Hi everyone, > > To my understanding, at least currently xor does not want FPI to pay him for his work. Some developers on FMS have proposed bug bounties - say, $1000 - for completing a task like "fix Windows tray / installer to work with 64-bit Java." This would be in a "first to get reviewed and merged gets paid" fashion, the idea being we can pay people not yet familiar with the project to familiarize themselves and not have to commit to paying an unknown developer hourly. At least one developer has asked that payment be available in crypto currency; this seems reasonable to me. Legally you have to be able to identify them for tax purposes (since you're doing this as FPI, not building some anonymous infrastructure for it). Or you end up liable for their taxes. Apart from that, bounties sound like a good idea. But IANAFD.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 819 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZDbVWAAoJEBzu1zFxXR53TyAP/3KFRW9zNCaXHpHtAFPiS4pL d9X+E3RBwH+XadNvUQcmEdfgjeFugyTgRWp444aVQvd2jKPLyY9iECIqXK7E3Jab /5VFRv2wPaStEbeNneJ0B//Dwkvj30u2xHGzvYr1ZpdzaZ1bayDBn0PKeg2WZFOv kiViEEFF9PCBsbV3JB0CO9edlnpXm9bVpB3utlTIPTP2EB8HifgJWE1DEHjUgpB7 ul9oXDaSw9qV+wuJnv1jCF2j80oCJ7/4T1QqzI9r4lHKKwCfEZk5YivC6+4X070N hp1cge2swb6QeUhFCAjBou2B9dTua5ile2Tm6LP133b58EmTIGGXT95EhjjX9b6f suBPSo2mOFLMMELkg2CaYzXKF+iVFb8vGMltY+GnZ9nExX+7HeyiNScwxQ0tnfQm Z6oDOiETj0+Y4S9LzoVmg5h7IUek6RPms4hWRloY2C/P1awXjH+oVD6KXG4pkWUz GmougkTsjzX8zwv8lS/QLs6hMHtRX1O3qitemx8f1c4iIBdOAraNPZZk5RuHwz/d A9Tb0n1vz9GBFQnY8wyuZTfBGRWz98QhcGpfx0ZrFO1VesV658YH0DvJM+ukpikS pOLhLw0eovv0wr76Qv01tKEW0Jqyf0WHQmrgOsqQFe3ndyJdslyAUQTZkZ6Ki/MN IBv6p5O02mCrwAj1w5Fw =qttk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----