Re: Some ideas on Freenet architecture
Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab-S0/[email protected]> Sun, 03 Sep 2017 21:53:08 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi toad, Matthew John Toseland <[email protected]> writes: > Thoughts? I'm not a dev any more, but thinking about Bitcoin and other > stuff maybe there are some ways forward that we've missed... > > Dispute resolution, spam and distributed data structures > -------------------------------------------------------- > > A key is disputable if: … > For any disputable key, any darknet node can vote at most once. Can you explain why we would want to bind darknet nodes (=real life identities) to voting about content? Currently this is done in the truly pseudonymous inner layer. What is the gain from disputable keys? Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 832 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE801qEjXQSQPNItXAE++NRSQDw+sFAlmsXiUACgkQE++NRSQD w+s9Bw/+Lhb/zUuBH/cIVUKUx361ZdbZ6Fhmx5Oon5c+gon6aBjE2DrlA529IPKw cnP526DZyFmgCukYPFtTkx4+Ha8mTYJm1xnwFIRlCMwGz40ps/hrRkNodxE1Db75 tGrOvOn5E1UNCB3xASeMi7KS6KUWk6NA+ZgokkqAQGxUL+9lUKzaxDHrS3fOGvrV oHBsczNmm1FWCFGbvEnaZ/PqYKWWC8VZDA6xvj1eYf5fX/Oss692Ii2RplweuJl6 c98JNlgK1vPiCTGNxskd3rB//G6YmFBdfMcrHRzOjho2Orm/fuY2b6k8Phl8XyCw PXLeQrpBmW6kAT7KJmBRKkSYftTvvDO3DErhMkWEBht8RJycylsYPeZU01bjkHM+ nsjvZv+LDL4HY7cZJCEiwZ/GIJcXW4zqe3WYZr3iAhvWejEn2rt0mwCWbbal7ryT wz9dbshbEV6uAr9R59vCQevFhdQ+/ZWK70JK/CMuSZDjZ3VsvaL4GJbRkq70eYO5 Ffew2TDZiqcw0ZdeYBQjZw5uw6igWxMUaQt2lOtw1mzmdvZ/tDg3aZJFZUUaGwcN ac6u9WY4NbDxbBcL9cyWWVzyHGhKUhTvLCLdk3+WOo7l30qbDOu+SZSNWPwMbqPY 2PQK7+ceZ0P58dFn1WMiUfE+YRgk2cjD4zrju4v2fjTeK1HMSfk= =rDGS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----