Re: accessibility of web of trust

Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab-S0/[email protected]> Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:17:12 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.network.freenet.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello Craig,

Thank you for writing!

A solution to CAPTCHAs for blind people are audio-CAPTCHAs, which are
already provided in the FMS forum system. These would need to be ported
to the WebOfTrust plugin, though.

See
http://127.0.0.1:8888/USK@0npnMrqZNKRCRoGojZV93UNHCMN-6UU3rRSAmP6jNLE,~BG-e=
dFtdCC1cSH4O3BWdeIYa8Sw5DfyrSV-TKdO5ec,AQACAAE/fms/-137/

Best wishes, and thank you for using Freenet!
Arne

Craig Mcgee <craig.mcgee-iEfuqNDpmZ/[email protected]> writes:

> Hello all, my name's Craig, and I thought it best to post this to the dev=
elopment list, rather than support, as it's more of an issue that devs will=
 need to sort out, than a help request, as I already got a friend to help i=
n this instance.
>
> I am totally blind, so use software on my computer that reads everything =
back to me, like text to speech, but it doesnt read captchas. I have anothe=
r bit of software that can solve captchas but only one per page, so the web=
 of trust page, for instance, that has 17 or so captchas on it can't cope w=
ith it, so this creates an access barrier. Luckily I had a friend I could s=
end over the screen shots of the pages too, to get them to send me back the=
 captchas, but this isn't really the point.
>
> I understand that there needs to be tight security, to stop people creati=
ng identities on web of trust, and then using said identities to spam and b=
e trusted inherantly, without proving that they are actually human, and the=
 fact the system is anonymous wouldn't obviously allow for people to use th=
ings like twitter or facebook to verify their web of trust identity, but I'=
m hoping that someone can come up with an idea that is more accessible than=
 captchas, but still keeps out bots. I thought maybe logic questions, or ma=
thematical questions but I dont know if bots are clever enough to understan=
d those, I suspect some are, so i'm not sure of the solution?
>
> Maybe a system where if you are blind you're advised to email either the =
support or development list with your web of trust ID and ask for someone t=
o validate it and add it to a list of ids that would be manually trusted by=
 developers after it passes some sort of anti spam test. if there was a sud=
den spike in emails, and say 100 emails came in in five minutes, then the p=
eople on the list would be more wary thinking it was spam, as its more manu=
al than the captcha process and this might be the way to do it?
>
> take care
> craig.


=2D-=20
Unpolitisch sein
hei=C3=9Ft politisch sein
ohne es zu merken

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=4QNQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--