Re: accessibility of web of trust
Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab-S0/[email protected]> Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:17:12 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Craig, Thank you for writing! A solution to CAPTCHAs for blind people are audio-CAPTCHAs, which are already provided in the FMS forum system. These would need to be ported to the WebOfTrust plugin, though. See http://127.0.0.1:8888/USK@0npnMrqZNKRCRoGojZV93UNHCMN-6UU3rRSAmP6jNLE,~BG-e= dFtdCC1cSH4O3BWdeIYa8Sw5DfyrSV-TKdO5ec,AQACAAE/fms/-137/ Best wishes, and thank you for using Freenet! Arne Craig Mcgee <craig.mcgee-iEfuqNDpmZ/[email protected]> writes: > Hello all, my name's Craig, and I thought it best to post this to the dev= elopment list, rather than support, as it's more of an issue that devs will= need to sort out, than a help request, as I already got a friend to help i= n this instance. > > I am totally blind, so use software on my computer that reads everything = back to me, like text to speech, but it doesnt read captchas. I have anothe= r bit of software that can solve captchas but only one per page, so the web= of trust page, for instance, that has 17 or so captchas on it can't cope w= ith it, so this creates an access barrier. Luckily I had a friend I could s= end over the screen shots of the pages too, to get them to send me back the= captchas, but this isn't really the point. > > I understand that there needs to be tight security, to stop people creati= ng identities on web of trust, and then using said identities to spam and b= e trusted inherantly, without proving that they are actually human, and the= fact the system is anonymous wouldn't obviously allow for people to use th= ings like twitter or facebook to verify their web of trust identity, but I'= m hoping that someone can come up with an idea that is more accessible than= captchas, but still keeps out bots. I thought maybe logic questions, or ma= thematical questions but I dont know if bots are clever enough to understan= d those, I suspect some are, so i'm not sure of the solution? > > Maybe a system where if you are blind you're advised to email either the = support or development list with your web of trust ID and ask for someone t= o validate it and add it to a list of ids that would be manually trusted by= developers after it passes some sort of anti spam test. if there was a sud= den spike in emails, and say 100 emails came in in five minutes, then the p= eople on the list would be more wary thinking it was spam, as its more manu= al than the captcha process and this might be the way to do it? > > take care > craig. =2D-=20 Unpolitisch sein hei=C3=9Ft politisch sein ohne es zu merken --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE801qEjXQSQPNItXAE++NRSQDw+sFAlyasvkACgkQE++NRSQD w+savA/7BqcJdZHpcCFCcNXeQa/9F8qkp4CeFY4Ej2zPYvvurHhPm3VUMnBq5Z+X DF2/FLmjdpn0W80lSP9s/KoQDJmILfVH9Fk5BHhS7mX8sDVqxLH99FwPrZF47TWS rsWX0f+AkJ0D4H8DD1j5x/KJhFCBAC/os6idvvxe01p/+gey0ICUsxnk1ZWoc8P2 rgTxYJxH+5OG46TjUPhN7Bbzzg1NF2eAnJmM6yrFMsJHppskx7bx1wWpuurdZ1yK ukT2oJhM0O8IwieikCPeCjIcvDbZ0bSDq6dg7gbWCKhbK6xWquUP+5C75+mVLAFo qImoqoPpx5sR5Ny802LmbTId57TQ9rZnZtok/G2pIhLBnl+baxr+6njY1alx39QE e+b/1GvyR4jEeU20glSZYE0PdvCM/0QHFDL8W5j9QepmBLwhUZq1+41ubjaJbEyf bKxOVLDUOIv+qK27IoiLs9Eq74jS7/vst7fmSaUb4sthhfXltH+pyylb7yoUvXsq gn/lVu69YNWy9AtdFMio88vGvdV850znc+sNvv41zMYH+ALpxxSRUevetfM+QKSD EKCly2fZ9MgjjIAULZxhKFrMIHKJ38TTdqDVS2fBVZfAewMKEskiJj5+uOWCxlrk Cdg7ZYMg8Utz68imvT/hlPnJ3y6xDK+oeJ5l+P9tkSQvTAKT2Z+IswQBAQgAHRYh BN0ovebZh1yrzkqLHdzPDbMLwQVIBQJcmrL5AAoJENzPDbMLwQVIGgcD/1W8GCth MQ2AQOZXoPk+bjMihDXCXrQurGHFh9jXeqOopQSkgVLMo4J58JzxS5F3Tk+WPK+h jtE12c0WXKDnhYXf1YiHfpaXJBmKOoVs76lz1VGCux392G04+HUIUbwvM+Qk2tza 9RzSCqm+lOUF5Fmw6UlRuCzs/SpYMSIVt3Zb =4QNQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--