Re: Arguments against the Darknet
"Lars Juel Nielsen" <[email protected]> Mon, 26 Jun 2006 00:42:02 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/26/06, Colin Davis <Colin-nnQb6z/[email protected]> wrote: > > > > If/when we do opennet people will use that instead till it gets > > blocked(it will happen eventually), then we're back to trying to get > > the darknet working for everyone again. If most people will use the > > opennet till it's impossible to do anymore there will be very few and > > probably small seperate darknets, a lot of data will be lost and time > > will need to be spent building up the net again as a darknet. > > I disagree- For one, Freenet .5 isn't blocked- For another, If > they're blocking freenet, they can block a darknet almost as easily. > Keep in mind, you do NOT need to expose network topography for a > darknet. Opennet is havestable so it's easier to block. And .5 is blocked in China so it has been done. It's also possible to do if it's a darknet but it'll require much more work to do. > > -Colin > _______________________________________________ > chat mailing list > [email protected] > Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat > Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe > _______________________________________________ chat mailing list [email protected] Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe