Re: Arguments against the Darknet

"Lars Juel Nielsen" <[email protected]> Mon, 26 Jun 2006 00:42:02 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.network.freenet.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 6/26/06, Colin Davis <Colin-nnQb6z/[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > If/when we do opennet people will use that instead till it gets
> > blocked(it will happen eventually), then we're back to trying to get
> > the darknet working for everyone again. If most people will use the
> > opennet till it's impossible to do anymore there will be very few and
> > probably small seperate darknets, a lot of data will be lost and time
> > will need to be spent building up the net again as a darknet.
>
> I disagree- For one, Freenet .5 isn't blocked- For another, If
> they're blocking freenet, they can block a darknet almost as easily.
> Keep in mind, you do NOT need to expose network topography for a
> darknet.

Opennet is havestable so it's easier to block.
And .5 is blocked in China so it has been done.
It's also possible to do if it's a darknet but it'll require much more
work to do.

>
> -Colin
> _______________________________________________
> chat mailing list
> [email protected]
> Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general
> Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat
> Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
>
_______________________________________________
chat mailing list
[email protected]
Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat
Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe