Re: Arguments against the Darknet
Roger Hayter <[email protected]> Mon, 26 Jun 2006 23:40:07 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In message <20060626194624.GB8623-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>, Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]> writes >On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 05:50:34PM +0100, Roger Hayter wrote: >> >> FWIW, I agree with all your points. And I would add that no-one is more >> than 2 steps away from a police spy - I find random connection *adds* >> plausible deniability: although not (and this is a valid point that has >> been made by the developers) if running Freenet is itself a crime. But >> if every friend has at least one friend who is a police spy, they are >> going to know you are running Freenet anyway. The only defence is to >> have so many people running Freenet that they don't bother to prosecute >> unless they already suspect you of something, in which case they will >> always find something to prosecute you for if they want to anyway. > >Having a network of informers is several orders of magnitude more >expensive than harvesting, or than compromizing the network with cancer >nodes, which would pretend to be thousands of nodes, and get connected >to everyone without having to lay out for a network of informants. This >is how security works: you make it expensive, not impossible, to get in. >The more expensive it is the less likely it is that they will try or >succeed. I suppose that I am assuming that anyone who *needs* to use Freenet is subject to investigation for more important (to the authorities) reasons than their use of Freenet. I am assuming the spying is for other purposes and Freenet just incidental. Having read your other comments, it is clearly important that people join Freenet for a range of different reasons, so sharing a connection with someone does not automatically label you as a co-conspirator: so we need to sell the darknet idea very strongly for this to come about. This in itself, as you say, is a reason not to let people use an opennet, which is so much easier to join. You have convinced me (FWIW!). -- Roger Hayter _______________________________________________ chat mailing list [email protected] Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe