Re: [Tech] Open-net

Opennet is a high priority, but there are a few things we must do  
first (such as sort out our load balancing issues, and decide on  
exactly how opennet should be implemented).

Ian.

On 8 Aug 2006, at 11:29, anonymous freenet user wrote:

>
> When will 'Open-net' be deployed?
>
> I would like very much to migrate to 0.7, but I cannot condone  
> doing so
> until 'open-net' is active and making a wider anonymity set  
> operational.
>
> As it is, 0.7 is not sufficiently anonymous, If I start a node, get  
> some
> refs and start inserting content, it doesn't take a whole lot of  
> rocket
> science to figure out that new content is probably coming from the new
> node.  Better by far to have open-net active, this makes it a LOT  
> easier
> for lots more people to join the 0.7 network and create a larger  
> crowd to
> get lost in.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tech mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
>

Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc.
phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog

_______________________________________________
chat mailing list
[email protected]
Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat
Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe