"Designed for Windows 8" = "Won't run Linux ever"
Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]> Sat, 29 Oct 2011 01:43:50 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============0000633486== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3355807.0bz0FrBKYs"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart3355807.0bz0FrBKYs Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable New trusted boot feature, supposedly to prevent malware (which unfortunatel= y is a legitimate problem), allows the vendor (or more likely Microsoft) to= decide exactly what operating systems you are allowed to install. This alr= eady happens with mobile phones, although some vendors (Apple) tend to be f= ascist about it, and some are very lax due to customer pressure (HTC).=20 Odds are servers will generally not enable this except where corporates wan= t it; cheap laptops and Apple will probably enable it without providing an = off switch; custom motherboards will leave it to the user, but since you ca= n't build a laptop, it's still a worry ... and migrating existing users to = linux will probably become a lost cause (not that it's easy now). I smell a= major anti-competition lawsuit, but they have several very plausible excus= es re security ... This may signal a new push for TPM, which after all is i= n most business laptops nowadays, but this may or may not happen given the = apparently rather large software development cost (it isn't needed for this= bit). The conspiracy theorist in me says if this becomes a matter of law o= r policy there will be some major cyber-attacks to "prove" that such things= are needed ... Bottom line: If it has the "Designed for Windows 8" logo (next year), you p= robably can't run Linux on it; another possible outcome is you may only be = able to run OSs approved by the hardware manufacturer, which could be very = messy, less likely. China will be delighted: The cheaper and more widespread this nonsense beco= mes, the more of the expensive development is done by third parties, the ea= sier it will be for them to really lock down cyberspace once they have poli= tical support for doing so (their incompetent, half hearted and illegal eff= ort in Green Dam was successfully rejected by the people but that was befor= e the Arab Spring, the hardliners are stronger now and economic chaos will = likely make this worse). http://linux.slashdot.org/story/11/09/21/062231/how-microsoft-can-lock-linu= x-off-windows-8-pcs http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/78727 Note to Freenet folks: I apologise for not being around much lately. I hope to be able to spend on= e day a week on Freenet consistently soon. I am cooking a small build, whic= h you can test (please test it!), and I am hoping to make further tweaks on= load management soon. However, some reports re performance are very encour= aging e.g. ArneBab reporting 14KB/sec file insert speeds. --nextPart3355807.0bz0FrBKYs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABEIAAYFAk6rTEcACgkQYUNbc3WUHYgvswCgniCs9YSTXBtcmGNrcjrprl2x LJkAn1FtMs7G3pAOuRhS1KrQGoqD1GL+ =5kFS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3355807.0bz0FrBKYs-- --===============0000633486== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ chat mailing list [email protected] Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe --===============0000633486==--