Re: Re: [freenet-dev] Important news for users of stable dual-network nodes -- Please read!
Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I am of the opinion that the unstable network is irrelevant at the moment. :) On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 07:21:17AM -0600, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 08:47:14 +0000, Roger Hayter <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > In message <20050225213702.15855c33-pd0mJjIfunkytbH/[email protected]>, Conrad J. > > Sabatier <[email protected]> writes > > >On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:31:21 +0000, Roger Hayter <[email protected]> > > >wrote: > > > > > >> In message <e1d8c65205022512002c2291d7-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>, Todd Walton > > >> <[email protected]> writes > > >> >On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:30:33 -0600, Conrad J. Sabatier > > >> ><[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >Please excuse the crossposting, but I felt this was important > > >enough > >to make sure it was seen by those who may not be subscribed > > >to this > >or that list. > > >> > > > >> >Right. But the No-No about crossposting is that there are likely > > >to > >be others who would not agree that it's important enough to > > >> >cross-post. > > >> > > > >> > > >> Then it's hard to be off-topic in chat, isn't it? For instance, I > > >> might remark that probably not many stable nodes will be upgraded > > >> unless some one builds a snapshot and increments the build number. > > > > > >Well, the dual-network capability is not enabled by default in the > > >source code, and has never been enabled in precompiled packages, so > > >anyone wanting to use it would still have to get the sources, > > >uncomment the two relevant lines in Version.java, and build a new > > >freenet.jar for themselves. > > > > > >In other words, it's still pretty much of an "elite" feature, and > > >will most likely remain so. > > > > > > > Maybe I misunderstood you: I thought you were hoping for many stable > > nodes (rather than dual-network nodes themselves) to be updated. All > > I was saying was that not many are likely to be updated unless you > > have a new build number and new snapshots available for said stable > > nodes. -- > > Roger Hayter > > No, I just wanted to try to get the word out to as wide a potential > audience as possible. I would *hope* that people involved enough in > freenet to undertake running a dual-network node would be subscribed to > at least one or two of these lists, but it's impossible, of course, to > know for sure if they are, or to which ones, so I just used the "spray > paint" approach. :-) > > The update itself doesn't really warrant a new build number, IMHO (or > maybe it does; I don't know). At any rate, for the "average" stable > user, the update is completely irrelevant and can be safely ignored; > it's really only the "elite" group of dual-network node users that > needed to be informed, and I just wanted to cover all the bases in one > fell swoop. > > The reason I felt it was so important was that, prior to this update, > the dual-network functionality was, in effect, pretty badly broken (at > least from the stable side), so I felt there was a certain urgency in > getting the word out. I also feel very strongly that the dual-network > nodes serve a very vital function, bridging the two otherwise completely > separate networks and helping to propagate data between the two, thereby > helping to enrich freenet's content for everyone. > > I hope I've cleared up any possible misunderstandings now. :-) > > -- > Conrad J. Sabatier <[email protected]> -- "In Unix veritas" > _______________________________________________ > chat mailing list > [email protected] > Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general > Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat > Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe -- Matthew J Toseland - toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. _______________________________________________ chat mailing list [email protected] Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCJcAXHzsuOmVUoi0RAnbGAJwPzePO7cvYITeDCXD9E46MACwckACfeO+m +hdwocTVkrr/jUN37YxKISg= =IP7h -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----