Re: [Tech] flaming ;-)
"Alex R. Mosteo" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Matthew Toseland wrote: > Well, the point is: The alternative is that the only people who will > ever use freenet are: > a) Seriously dedicated libertarians like us, who consider the kiddy porn > to be a price worth paying, and > b) Psychos who don't care. I have no further arguments than the ones presented by others, but for the record I'm too against any censorship. C.p. and whatever are problems to be dealt with in the real world. Internet is already full of questionable content. What I think is that Freenet must be an attempt at the purest free speech. The moment it has some censorship in place it will be worth no more than any other politically correct project (just IMO, of course). _______________________________________________ chat mailing list [email protected] Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe