Re: Re: [Tech] Crazy idea: How trust in darknets enables secure democratic censorship
Tom Kaitchuck <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Matthew Toseland wrote: >On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:33:03AM -0700, Tom Kaitchuck wrote: > > >>Matthew Toseland wrote: >> >> >>>Well, if the invaders start censoring stuff posted by the minority, the >>>expected result is that the minority would sever links with the >>>invaders - as a normal part of an upheld complaint, because the minority >>>would oppose the motion. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>And go where? It is a darknet, they don't know each other personally, >>how can they connect? (especially given that they know they shouldn't >>trust most people.) >> >> > >Ummm, they'd still have their own connections, which make up a >contiguous darknet built from knowing each other personally. What's the >problem? > > Suppose 5% of people want to talk about something 50% find it offencive and 45% don't care? Odds are not every person in that 5% is connected to everyone else in that 5% without going through someone in the 50%! And even if they can through those in the 45%, this clearly implies the network cannot split. So how will routing work for each of these three groups? _______________________________________________ chat mailing list [email protected] Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe