Re: [Tech] Crazy idea: How trust in darknets enables secure democratic censorship
Evan Daniel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.general,gmane.network.freenet.technical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/12/05, Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]> wrote: > /me renames Freenet PornNet. ;) > > I have friends who rsync their porn. But I can see your point. Is this > an issue only for porn? What class of material is subject to this > consideration? Personally I avoid material that could be used to > blackmail me, traceable or not. And I have friends who watch porn in coed groups. I think they're weird, but then they probably say the same about my ex-poultry :) Other classes of material: anything that could be seen as incitement to revolt probably counts. The difference between rebels that history approves of vs condemns appears to be decided after the fact. Having Freenet be relevant to revolutions would be damaged by this, right? And it seems entirely reasonable for me to want to anonymize my revolutionary plots by mixing them up with other people's searches for deceased fowls. Writings about drug use also come to mind, though these seem to be relatively accepted on the public internet. That probably isn't as true in, say, much of Asia, though. > > Your privacy against local nodes is only an issue if your content is > voted down. If you're not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to fear. Evan Daniel _______________________________________________ chat mailing list [email protected] Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe