Re: Crazy idea: How trust in darknets enables secure de

On 7/12/05, Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]> wrote: 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 11:33:15PM -0400, Juiceman wrote:
> > If you really feel the need to do something like this:
> > Why not just support blacklisting of CHK's that are known objectionable
> > material. If the node comes across a request for one of these, it will 
> pass
> > it along but refuse to cache it thereby making people feel all warm and
> > fuzzy about not helping the c.p. or whatever spread.
> 
> Because this would be a token gesture. It would not be useful, it would
> tend to undermine routing, requests would be redirected by per node
> failure tables, there would need to be constant maintenance of
> blacklists rather than occasional verification of objectionable content,
> and above all it would not seriously discourage the poster. What I
> propose is a means by which a darknet community can produce a deterrent
> (which is not to blow the anonymity of the original poster - except to
> his friends - but to sever connections with him), and when a poster is
> an entire subnetwork, it provides a means for the network to fork.

 Speaking of fork, please release a working freenet (open model or 
open/darknet) before you go off coding this.

-- 
> "I might not like what you have to say, but I will defend your right to 
> say it!"

_______________________________________________
chat mailing list
[email protected]
Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat
Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe