Re: Crazy idea: How trust in darknets enables secure democratic censorship

Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.freenet.general,gmane.network.freenet.technical
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 01:41:37PM +0200, Rainer Kupke wrote:
> Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 11:52:00AM +0200, Rainer Kupke wrote:
> > > Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]> wrote:
> > > 
> > > [voting against nodes that insert objectionable content]
> > > 
> > > After a night of sleep I came up with two strategies to defeat your
> > > idea:
> > > 
> > > First strategy:
> > > 1. run several small nodes and never use them to insert stuff. These
> > > nodes are "good citizerns".
> > 
> > This is perfectly valid. You can run a node.
> > > 
> > > 2. Create a new node N
> > > 
> > > 3. Use N to insert content
> > > 
> > > 4. Delete N before reprimands hit.
> > 
> > This is quite possible, however I don't see how you are going to be able
> > to repeat it, due to the nature of a darknet. Also it might hurt the
> > people you connected through.
> 
> I assume that the inserting node gets more blame than the surrounding
> nodes and that blame does not stick around forever. Maybe for a very
> long time, but definitely not forever. 
> 
> So I can surround my "inserter" with one (as above) or more layers of
> nodes which act as "blame absorbers".
> 
> When I insert evil stuff my "inserter" will be blamed for it. The nodes
> next to it will get some fraction of the blame, but definitely less.
> the nodes on the outer layer will get nearly no blame. 

They will get no blame, unless they oppose the complaint.
> 
> Before the nodes on my outer layer get blamed for talking to evil nodes
> I shutdown the core of my little "evilnet" and replace it with new
> nodes.

If complaints are repeatedly held up against new nodes connected to a
specific small number of nodes, it should be possible for the community
to notice this and take action against _them_. The network topology has
to be open for premix routing to work, and the node which was punished
is revealed when a complaint is upheld.
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.

_______________________________________________
chat mailing list
[email protected]
Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat
Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC1P6gHzsuOmVUoi0RAsksAJ4g372DmWwZ6DXBH06LLvZRHYS+HQCfWd8N
428iQhRe1LcxqYytT2iqAfc=
=ksWj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.