Re: Re: [Tech] flaming ;-)

On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 09:10:15PM +0000, Anonymous Sender wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
> 
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 13:32:27 +0100, you wrote:
> >
> > What do you think we've been doing for the last N years? The whole
> > purpose of a darknet would be to make it hard to detect. As far as
> > "absolute freedom of speech" goes, nobody has yet convinced me that the
> > Church of Scientology, Diebold or the office of Richard Nixon would be
> > able to censor material which is in the public interest.
> 
> The problem is that VERY FEW people ever agree 100% on what 
> constitutes 'public interest'

Sure, which is why you'd need a strong majority. But anyway it's not
possible.
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.

_______________________________________________
chat mailing list
[email protected]
Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat
Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC1lVFHzsuOmVUoi0RAvbtAJ43Xnis1pnCLi66iot7rGSrhZMwzwCgnUft
5ExDijSLl1bERPBQoL/S3a8=
=/4e+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----