New criminal offences?: patent infringement, writing filesharing software, inciting to violate intellectual property
Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
There is a new EU directive proposed: "Member States shall ensure that all intentional infringements of an intellectual property right on a commercial scale, and attempting, aiding or abetting and inciting such infringements, are treated as criminal offences." Custodial sentences would be available for individuals committing such an offence. At present, "on a commercial scale" is not defined. Fines, confiscations, closures of establishments, permanent or temporary bans on engaging in commercial activities, judicial supervision or winding up, a ban on access to public assistance of subsidies (their words), and publication of judicial decisions, will also be available in some cases. So a sole trader who accidentally infringes the patent on the electronic shopping cart could _actually go to prison_. Nice. Or, perhaps, be denied access to state benefits while simultaneously being prohibited from engaging in commercial activity (interpreted narrowly, this would seem to mean that he can't run his own business and is doomed to be a shop/office drone; interpreted broadly it means becoming an unperson and joining the criminal underground). Presumably "in appropriate cases" restricts these sanctions to where they would seem reasonable. Proof: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2005/com2005_0276en01.pdf Other issues with this directive: - It will make it easier to prosecute filesharers, which presumably is a big part of the intention. You don't have to profit from the infringement, so as long as enough people downloaded an infringing file, that will be regarded as "on a commercial scale". - It would seem to make it possible to prosecute authors of filesharing programs as "aiding... intentional infringements of an intellectual property right on a commercial scale". Whether this would apply to networks with significant noninfringing uses such as Freenet is uncertain. Interpreted broadly it could lead to somewhere *really* dark (and look at the legal drift we've seen in the patent office). A narrow interpretation is possible - it is already possible to sue filesharing networks for contributory copyright infringement, even in europe, but this is a civil process at present. - Inciting IP violations on a commercial scale is almost equally interesting. Could be some interesting freedom of speech trials under that one... :| -- Matthew J Toseland - toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. _______________________________________________ chat mailing list [email protected] Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC1osHHzsuOmVUoi0RAvycAJoDGoUWOqqtB2yDFoU4VnZQaIeX2QCfZdbr Exgt1kePGQgjDsDbyyf8zE0= =3IPF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----