Re: Re: New criminal offences?: patent infringement, writing filesharing software, inciting to violate intellectual property
Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 09:30:40PM +0000, Bob wrote: > > Yeah. Again, much reference is made to organised crime, willfull/knowing > abetting of direct infringment and direct financial gain from encouraging it but > it doesn't actually _say_ that these are criteria. If they are, then it sounds a > lot like the interpretation of US law against the original Napster plus some > "OMG TEH MAFIA!!1!" scaremongering (given that such ventures are handled > adequately by existing law) and we have nothing to worry about given that > Freenet project inc. doesn't support, promote or profit from such actions and > afaik isn't organised crime :) Beyond that there's no real conclusions that can > be drawn without a formal directive submission that explains such points. The PDF has everything IIRC... > > Bob -- Matthew J Toseland - toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. _______________________________________________ chat mailing list [email protected] Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC3tjQHzsuOmVUoi0RAtrHAJ9MUQlLcPX22GA62jNfbgWGVThVBwCfVwsF SNck0T16DVCykk8ez/0yheA= =v8fn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----