Re: Interesting academic study of security threats
Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hmm, interesting. My understanding is that scale free networks can be neutralized very easily, but small world networks are very robust, and human networks (and therefore darknets) are much closer to small world than scale free. I will read it when I get around to it... On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 10:33:18PM +0100, Roger Hayter wrote: > The link below is to an academic study of the destruction and the > defence of secure (human or electronic) networks and may be of some > interest to those looking at topology. > > http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/TechReports/UCAM-CL-TR-637.html -- Matthew J Toseland - toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. _______________________________________________ chat mailing list [email protected] Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC5QIqHzsuOmVUoi0RAlcxAJ9scRMRfdEcuyXVNEy20Y6onXrhWQCgsQre jiTYsMWOU2PkZ8ATiskVogM= =ORDz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----