Re: Revision control systems

On 22 Sep 2005, at 17:27, Matthew Toseland wrote:

> http://www.gnu.org/software/gnu-arch/
>
> Anyone had any experience? There is already a port to freenet, and the
> guy who wrote it might perhaps be persuaded to update it; if not, we
> might, eventually. The description sounds good.

I have heard that it is a bit of a kludge, a mixture of scripts.

Seriously, the most important thing with a source control system is  
stability and reliability.  Subversion is stable and reliable, and is  
the emerging natural successor to cvs.

My vote remains with Subversion.

Ian.