Re: [i2p] The Problem With Anonymous Money

Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.freenet.general
Message-ID <20051013105347.GA6212__42912.0107590736$1129201404$gmane$org@amphibian.dyndns.org>
Yodel is to a large degree pseudonymous. We can hold pseudonymous people
accountable to a degree. But as I have explained in my other email, the
traditional model of banking is _not the only way to do it_. A
distributed model can work well enough - even without coinage, virtual
or otherwise.

On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 07:01:21AM +0000, Polecat wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Both parties can't be simultaneously anonymous.
> 
> Consider that Yodel bank has an IP address, founders, maintainers,
> administrators, controllers.  All of these people can be found with
> minimal effort from the state, even in our current governments.  Yodel,
> and other "anonymous" banks, have the weakness that the bank itself is
> not anonymous.  It can't be anonymous.  If it were anonymous, you would
> send your money to it, and then it would evaporate and you'd never see
> your money again.
> 
> Accountability, anonymity, they don't mix.
> 
> Now, that doesn't rule out an anonymous bank.  It is technically
> possible to have an anonymous bank.  In fact to a degree, most paper
> currency is an anonymous bank.  But even bills have serial numbers, and
> the problem with Yodel and such is, once they started succeeding, to
> protect their interests the corporates would require under pain of law
> that the bank, and all banks, keep track of their money.
> 
> So, what if someone uses a Yodel account /as/ a bank?  Well that doesn't
> work either, because if Yodel gets wind that Yodel2 is not keeping
> records, serial numbers, etc, then Yodel2's account will be frozen under
> pain of law, because the original Yodel will be forced to do so by the
> authorities.
> 
> It's a chicken and egg problem.  Supposing two anonymous people want to
> transact. One has a transmittable product. The other has anonymous
> e-cash.  Who sends their end of the bargain first?  That's why we cannot
> hold anonymous people accountable, and therefore cannot participate in
> transactions of money.
> - --
> polecat - get in touch with your primal ferret
> pgp key at http://polecat.i2p/polecat.asc
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFDTf7T9lD1iiB3dSsRAimbAKCheFD/GyPnsSmzIfEEHgP7voY20QCeJzOi
> 9i8Ycjc+lQbVTFW8diVqF2s=
> =OVY9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> i2p mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://dev.i2p.net/mailman/listinfo/i2p

-- 
Matthew J Toseland - toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.

_______________________________________________
i2p mailing list
[email protected]
http://dev.i2p.net/mailman/listinfo/i2p

_______________________________________________
chat mailing list
[email protected]
Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat
Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDTjy7HzsuOmVUoi0RAtIHAJ9XV3r7JX66zIiwqcJVeoSAPWUFiACeOYNJ
eC0rh+mMREhD8hdikN+rhSk=
=QR+V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.