Re: idea
Dennis Nezic <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.support |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 21:35:00 +0100, folkert wrote: > Well I was thinking maybe in the future we're all using mesh > networking over wifi (or whatever wireless protocol we then have). > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesh_networking Freenet-Darknet should work wonderfully over such a network :). (Well, assuming you're not roaming. And that the meshes aren't too isolated :p). > Ok, that was not your point :-) Ok currently maybe not too many nodes > in the net but maybe this changes when governments restrict access to > what you can browse. Here in Europe governments already start talking > about installing filters. This is why you /don't/ want any kind of broadcasting, or any other kind of leak of identifiable traffic. Just encrypted non-identifiable "noise". > Currently only for kiddy porn but I'm afraid that when such a filter > is in place the step to block certain political views or so is much > smaller. Obviously. Their (Statist's) worst enemy is the free flow of information. > It is also a matter of convenience. If I visit some conference I don't > want to be hassled with the need of configuring all kinds of software > just to get "work done". It's a tradeoff -- ease-of-use and anonymity. _______________________________________________ Support mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-request-RdDMkVZAZeuJnvDnx1genB2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe