Re: attention users of both freenet networks

Ray Jones <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.freenet.support
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 02/26/2011 01:11 PM, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
> On Saturday 26 February 2011 16:04:41 Dennis Nezic wrote:
>
>> The community-censorship idea proposed was retarded, yes.
> On the contrary, some form of community-based censorship can be required for 
> smaller communities to run Freenet in order to keep a “clean” network (by 
> whatever standards).

A good choice of words, "can be required for smaller communities". A
good example might be the private boards on the Frost messaging system.
By the same token such censorship can also ensure a "dirty" network
within a small community. And it's all carried on the same network!


Ray

_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
[email protected]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-request-RdDMkVZAZeuJnvDnx1genB2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 230 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAk1pbLUACgkQ+4ss9jN3x+9NHQD9HT6RM1rpTyg0i/Hc5Pr+wz4K
oHkJ9i1mgnMJAwpzbE8A/3W/Pvuji1C7N74lKU+RGbnK2YqMFeB3441au6j8WSwD
=ieGr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.