Re: http fproxy ports are not closed

Dennis Nezic <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.freenet.support
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:02:14 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:44:17 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > netstat (netstat -pnat | grep java) shows 213 connections to my
> > fproxy at 127.0.0.1:8888, in a "CLOSE_WAIT" state. I only noticed
> > this after I could no longer access fproxy -- probably because of
> > some thread or connection limit. I'm not exactly sure how to
> > reproduce this -- it's not simply a matter of opening a connection
> > to fproxy.
> 
> False alarm. I think my freenet wget spider got out of control.
> Apologies.

Upon further consideration, I think it might actually be a bug. For one
thing, this never happened with earlier pre-1401ish versions. For
another thing, why are there so many sockets open, when my wget client
has long since closed and exited? (it has been about half an hour now --
I'll provide updates if they ever do close.) CLOSE_WAIT apparently
means fproxy got the FIN signal from my wget, but didn't close it's end?

I'm still not sure exactly how this bizarre behavior (of not closing
sockets) starts -- because if I restart freenet, and do a simple wget
transaction, the socket does get properly closed.
_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
[email protected]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-request-RdDMkVZAZeuJnvDnx1genB2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.